https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

content


Don’t wait for Armageddon

Don’t wait for Armageddon

Some believe the National Incident Management System should be used more often
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st February 2008

In 2004, when Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge announced approval of the National Incident Management System, many first responders were unsure whether the new guidelines would yield real on-the-ground improvements in the way emergencies were handled or add another layer of bureaucracy to make the planning, budgeting and training aspects of their jobs more burdensome.

In the beginning, at least, these were valid questions, as state, local and federal authorities mulled how to implement the nation’s first standardized management system outlining the actions all levels of government should take during a large-scale emergency response. Now the question seems to be: Why isn’t NIMS being used more often?

The roots of NIMS can be traced to the 9/11 Commission, which recommended making homeland security funding contingent upon local entities’ adoption of an Incident Command System (ICS) to strengthen teamwork in a crisis, including the development of regional approaches to often-faced hazards, such as wildfires in Southern California. NIMS was designed to provide a controlled, organized and unified command structure that would enable police, fire and emergency medical personnel to respond efficiently and effectively to major events.

Especially important, the 9/11 Commission said, was establishment of consistent methods and lines of communication in order to most efficiently put resources where they were needed in an emergency. A large percentage of the education and training mandated by NIMS concerns communications-related topics such as interoperability.

Three years after NIMS was approved, however, opinions differ as to whether the guidelines are having the intended effect. While the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is happy to point out what it considers NIMS successes in dealing with such crises as the avian influenza outbreak of 2002 and the space shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003, critics are quick to point out the massive failure of the response to Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana in 2005 as indicative of the spotty adherence to NIMS requirements, even by federal government agencies.

Unfortunately, neither DHS nor the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) readily makes public information they may have on how often and in what circumstances NIMS is used.

However, last year’s California wildfires offer a fair examination of how the system is being used, in part because together they are the most recent large-scale incident in which NIMS guidelines were followed, and partly because the ICS on which NIMS is largely based has its roots in the 1970s, when it was begun as an effort to coordinate large-scale, multiagency response to wildfires in California and other states.

There was some criticism for the way NIMS guidelines were — or, perhaps more accurately, were not — carried out once the disaster was well under way. Local news entities reported on complaints by fire personnel about resource allocation, particularly decisions about how and where air assets were deployed; there was grumbling about insufficient numbers of trucks at the ready to carry personnel to the scenes of “hot spots,” which may have caused some additional property loss in areas where the fire was thought to be extinguished; and there were logistical problems that caused shortages of food and other supplies in fire camps.

“There was a real problem with a shortage of fire spotters,” said U.S. Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.), who represents parts of San Diego County. “There were dozens of aircraft that could have been used early on that were not because the state didn’t have enough fire spotters, by their rules, to coordinate the drops.” California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL-FIRE) rules stipulate that each fire spotter can only coordinate drops for a single aircraft; after Bilbray’s complaints, that policy was altered so that each spotter could request drops for up to three aircraft.

But other aspects largely were positive, particularly where it concerned the public-notification and preparedness training that emergency personnel received. “Our efforts to reach out to people and tell them what was coming were successful, with reverse-911 and through the media,” said San Diego County spokesman Luis Monteagudo. “It’s good when you can let people know something’s happening and at least reduce the loss of life, even if you don’t reduce as much property loss as you’d like.”

CAL-FIRE spokesman Daniel Berlant called the wildfire evacuations “the largest mass evacuations [resulting from] a natural disaster California has ever seen” and said that one reason the task of moving so many people out of harm’s way went so well was the uniformity of notification efforts across county lines. (See “School of Hard Knocks,” MRT January.)

“We were doing the same thing that other counties were doing, in terms of timetables and how we got the word out in different areas, all over Southern California,” Berlant said. “There’s definitely a benefit to having a uniform set of standards everyone can adhere to, especially if it’s prepared and they don’t have to discuss it once an emergency starts.”

Another key aspect of NIMS — the coordination of multiple responding agencies — seemed to work well, according to sources. The system established an architecture to support on-site incident commanders that covered emergency operations center (EOC) procedures, facilities and communications. For example, a joint information center (JIC) provided a structure and protocols for communicating consistent, timely and accurate information to those affected by the event. As a result, the many agencies at all levels of government that were involved in fighting the fires were able to work together fairly well and, for the most part, convey a consistent, accurate message about the extent of the fires, the measures being taken to fight them in different locations and when evacuated residents could expect to return to their homes.

“The coordination of all those resources had its rough spots, to be sure, but overall I think people were pretty pleased with the way things went,” Berlant said. “The problems that we saw definitely weren’t unique to these fires, and I don’t know that they could be attributed to anything other than the magnitude of what was happening.”

Emergency management personnel who look at the California fires as exactly the kind of large-scale event for which NIMS was intended and designed to address may wonder whether the system will work on a smaller scale for a more localized event, such as a chemical spill or tornado. Ken Murphy, director of the Oregon Office of Emergency Management and president of the National Emergency Management Association (NEMA), says that for whatever flaws it may have, NIMS offers enough flexibility to be useful in many smaller-scale situations.

“A lot of [NIMS] can be applied to smaller emergencies that may not involve an entire region but one or two jurisdictions,” Murphy said. “Communications and public information processes are applicable in just about any scenario, and any time there is more than one agency involved there can be questions about authority and chains of command.”

The three main components of NIMS are applicable to any emergency situation that presents itself, regardless of size or complexity, according to Al DuPree, a FEMA spokesman. Specifically, the ICS defines the operating characteristics, management components and structure of incident management organizations throughout an incident; the Multiagency Coordination System defines the operating characteristics, management components and organizational structure of supporting entities; and the Public Information System defines the processes, procedures and systems for communicating with the public.

“Any of these systems can be used in just about any emergency situation,” DuPree said. “Even if we’re talking about different agencies in the same jurisdiction, following these procedures can help keep everybody on the same page and eliminate redundancy and wasted efforts.”

DuPree said that FEMA doesn’t issue hard-and-fast rules about when NIMS should go into effect. Personnel who are adequately trained in the system, he said, are capable of making those decisions themselves as needed.

“What we hear from people who have taken our training is that it gets them in the habit of thinking in these terms, and when it becomes necessary to put some of these principles into effect, they’re ready,” DuPree said. “Everybody from the top command of an agency down will know the difference between a car accident that affects a few people and a chemical spill or something bigger that may affect hundreds or thousands. And they have an idea of what kinds of resources may be necessary to address any situation.”

Another virtue of NIMS, said Murphy, is that it can change based on the experiences of emergency management people everywhere; those who are skeptical of NIMS and its applicability to different situations can always offer their input and, perhaps, help improve the system.

“What [NIMS] really comes down to is a set of best practices,” Murphy said, “and better best practices can always come along.”

Tags: content

Most Recent


  • Don’t wait for Armageddon
    Newscan: Securing the Internet of Things is quite a challenge
    Also: EWA requests dismissal of 900 MHz applications; TIA names tech and policy priorities for 2014; IJIS Institute names Shumate Award winner; App makes bus waits more tolerable; a Blackberry comeback may be in the offing.
  • Don’t wait for Armageddon
    Newscan: FCC certifies Carlson Wireless's white-space radio
    Also: Congress looks to revamp telecom law; Obama to place some restraints on surveillance; IEEE to study spectrum-occupancy sensing for white-spaces broadband; Major Swedish transport operator opts for Sepura TETRA radios; RFMD to partner on $70 million next-generation power grid project; NENA opens registratiuon for "911 Goes to Washington."
  • Don’t wait for Armageddon
    Newscan: A look at the critical job of 911 dispatchers
    Also: NYC launches website for tracking 911 response times; Oregon implements 911 on pre-paid cell phones; LightSquared wants to keep spectrum assets; Harris receives multiple government orders; FCC extends rebanding financial reconciliation deadline; Zetron gear at core of communications system upgrade; Ritron debuts wireless access control system; EWA seeks policy review of VHF vehicular repeater system deployments.
  • Don’t wait for Armageddon
    Newscan: Average peak data rates of 144 MB/s average realized in tests with CAT 4 LTE device
    Also: Verizon, T-Mobile to swap unused spectrum to improve coverage; Internet giants oppose surveillance--but only when the government does it; FCC Chairman says incentive auction will be delayed until middle of 2015; FCC chair announces staff appointments; Alcatel-Lucent names Tim Krause as chief marketing officer; New Jersey county deploys TriTech CAD system; Toronto airport deploys 26-position Zetron console system;

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • RugGear: Contributing to the future of mission-critical broadband communication review and market vision
  • Photo gallery: 2014 Communications Marketing Conference (CMC) in Tucson
  • Don’t wait for Armageddon
    Top 5 Stories - Week of Sept. 22
  • Don’t wait for Armageddon
    RCA plans to expand this year's Technical Symposium

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

The Future of Interoperability for Dispatch Console Solutions dlvr.it/Slcp33

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: A look in at the Panel Session of Interconnected Critical Networks - Voice, Video and Data Interoperability... #IWCE23 http…

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: Wildfires are a growing concern, but technology can offer solutions. Fantastic panel moderated by @FirstNetGov this morning a…

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

IWCE speakers debate state of public-safety interoperability dlvr.it/SlcZ5L

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

UK competition watchdog delays Airwave-Motorola Solutions ruling until April dlvr.it/SlcNxN

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

Gallery: IWCE 2023 kicks off in Las Vegas dlvr.it/SlZlk4

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

AT&T claims LTE coverage edge, FirstNet build more than 99% done dlvr.it/SlXZfr

27th March 2023
UrgentComm

Verizon Frontline supports U.S. Forest Service efforts against wildfires dlvr.it/SlX1g3

27th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.