https://urgentcomm.com/wp-content/themes/ucm_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • Commentary
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • All Things IWCE
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • IWCE
    • Conference
    • Special Events
    • Exhibitor Listings
    • Premier Partners
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Register for IWCE
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • Mission Critical Technologies
    • TU-Auto
  • In the field
    • Back
    • In the field
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Internet of Things
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Call Center/Command
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Network Tech
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Operations
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Regulations
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • Organizations
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
Urgent Communications
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • News
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Omdia Crit Comms Circle Podcast
    • Galleries
    • IWCE’s Video Showcase
    • IWCE 2023 Pre-event Guide
    • IWCE 2022 Winter Showcase
  • Commentary
    • Back
    • All Things IWCE
    • Urgent Matters
    • View From The Top
    • Legal Matters
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • UC eZines
    • Sponsored content
  • IWCE
    • Back
    • Conference
    • Why Attend
    • Exhibitor Listing
    • Floor Plan
    • Exhibiting Information
    • Join the Event Mailing List
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Statement
  • Related Sites
    • Back
    • American City & County
    • IWCE
    • Light Reading
    • IOT World Today
    • TU-Auto
  • newsletter
  • In the field
    • Back
    • Internet of Things
    • Broadband Push-to-X
    • Project 25
    • Public-Safety Broadband/FirstNet
    • Virtual/Augmented Reality
    • Land Mobile Radio
    • Long Term Evolution (LTE)
    • Applications
    • Drones/Robots
    • IoT/Smart X
    • Software
    • Subscriber Devices
    • Video
  • Call Center/Command
    • Back
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • NG911
    • Alerting Systems
    • Analytics
    • Dispatch/Call-taking
    • Incident Command/Situational Awareness
    • Tracking, Monitoring & Control
  • Network Tech
    • Back
    • Cybersecurity
    • Interoperability
    • LMR 100
    • LMR 200
    • Backhaul
    • Deployables
    • Power
    • Tower & Site
    • Wireless Networks
    • Coverage/Interference
    • Security
    • System Design
    • System Installation
    • System Operation
    • Test & Measurement
  • Operations
    • Back
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • Enterprise
    • Federal Government/Military
    • Public Safety
    • State & Local Government
    • Training
  • Regulations
    • Back
    • Narrowbanding
    • T-Band
    • Rebanding
    • TV White Spaces
    • None
    • Funding
    • Policy
    • Regional Coordination
    • Standards
  • Organizations
    • Back
    • AASHTO
    • APCO
    • DHS
    • DMR Association
    • ETA
    • EWA
    • FCC
    • IWCE
    • NASEMSO
    • NATE
    • NXDN Forum
    • NENA
    • NIST/PSCR
    • NPSTC
    • NTIA/FirstNet
    • P25 TIG
    • TETRA + CCA
    • UTC
acc.com

Call Center/Command


Let’s get started

Let’s get started

Once user needs and resources are understood, system engineering begins with RF planning.
  • Written by Urgent Communications Administrator
  • 1st August 2010

After the systems engineer has an understanding of the proposed land-mobile radio system user's needs, budget process and the available technologies, the next step starts the real engineering work, i.e., the radio frequency (RF) planning process. This section will introduce some of the fundamentals of RF engineering, but there is much more to the engineering process than just these fundamentals. We will cover more of the RF engineering items in later articles, but it is imperative that the reader understands these fundamentals first.

The RF planning process begins with an understanding of the customer requirements and ends with a decision that includes the technical requirements and financial constraints. In between, myriad design elements must be considered, including the following:

  • Frequency band selection;
  • RF link budgets, including RF coverage drive-testing;
  • Regulations and technical capabilities of the repeaters, base stations and subscribers;
  • Radio transmissions, including RF coverage planning;
  • Radio site locations;
  • Verification and testing of noise and interference; and
  • Understanding of the receivers' ability to hear signals above the noise and interference.

The frequency band will have a major influence on the rest of the system design. It will dictate the type and size of the antennas, the choice for the transmission lines, the necessary height of the tower(s), the complexity of the radios, and the amount of interference that can be expected over the life of the equipment. In most circumstances, the range and reliability of the system will be based on the band that the engineer chooses for the system to operate on. (See sidebar.)

Another factor to consider when choosing a band for operation concerns interoperability with other units with which the radios must communicate. With the advent of software-defined radios — which identify and move to open frequencies without the user realizing it is happening — and multiband radios, the need to always use the same band as your neighbors or workmates has been lessened. The trade-off is the considerably higher price of the subscriber units.

The link budget takes into account all of the gains and losses experienced by the signal as it moves from the transmitter to the receiver; it takes into account the amount of power being transmitted, the circuit path loss, and the difference between the received level and the receiver's ability to hear a signal at that level. For instance, when the received signal level exceeds the receiver sensitivity and is above any noise and interference, then you have a viable working communications path. If the received level is below the sensitivity of the receiver, or there is detrimental localized noise and interference, then you do not have a viable communications path.

There are many elements of the radio link budget — both in the talk-out, or downlink, path and the talk-back, or uplink, path — to be considered. These include base station transmitters, cavity filter losses, coaxial transmission line losses, transmitter antenna gains, RF path loss, subscriber receiver antenna gains, coaxial transmission line losses, and the subscriber receiver's ability to interpret the signal over any noise or interference in the downlink path.

More specifically, in a typical radio system — conventional or trunked — establishing the link budget in the downlink path starts with the base station or repeater transmitter, coaxial jumper and the combining of multiple transmitters or cavity filtering to prevent transmitter noise and intermodulation. After the combiner or cavity filtering, the system engineer must take into account another jumper, the lightning surge arrestor, the large coaxial cable that runs up the tower or rooftop, yet another jumper, and finally the termination at the transmit antenna.

In the uplink path, the engineer first considers the transmitter power, any losses to the subscriber antenna, and the type and location of the antenna. Then there is the path loss, the base station or repeater receive antenna — either proceeding to a low-noise amplifier located with the antenna and/or a jumper, then proceeding to the large coaxial cable — the lightning surge arrestor, another jumper, a pre-selector filter, and finally the receiver multicoupler (if the system uses multiple receivers in the same band).

Balancing of the link budget between the downlink and uplink is critical to allow the mobiles and portables to have the same coverage in both directions, in order to prevent receiving a signal and not being able to return the call, and vice versa.

The transmitter power is the baseline part of the link budget. If you do not need to cover a large geographic area, then low-power transmitters will work well. But if you need to cover a large geographic area — or an area where you need quite a bit of signal due to obstructions attenuating the signal — then you need to start with a high level of transmitter power.

To further the discussion of link budgeting, we next focus on the individual components, starting with the base station transmitters, which are specified in watts — this needs to be converted to decibels using the equation, PdBm = 30 + 10 log Pwatts.

When a radio manufacturer submits its products to be type-accepted by the FCC or other regulating body, so that the product can be sold and used legally, the maximum and minimum power utilized by the transmitter will be taken into consideration. This means that any given radio transmitter cannot operate above, or below, a certain power level. The system engineer must know ahead of time, during the design phase of a project, what the transmitter power range must be before the equipment is placed into service, as the power level for a given radio cannot be varied by much.

The full transmitter power will not be the same as the power that is fed into the antenna. There will be losses caused by connectors, transmission line loss, duplexer or other filter losses, isolators, and any impedance mismatches. The actual transmitter power, which not only takes into account system losses but also gains, is referred to as Effective Radiated Power, or ERP.

In order to make up for system losses, the engineer can use a high-gain antenna such that the losses can be overcome, and in some cases, actually provide for a true gain of system performance. We will spend more time on antenna systems in a future article.

With advances in technology, and as the frequencies of operation expand above 1 GHz, antenna design engineers began to model devices such as parabolic reflectors using computer programs, as the standard dipole antennas did not lend themselves to the formulas unless a focus point was used in the design. These engineers started using the term Effective Isotropic Radiated Power, or EiRP, to describe the patterns and gains, but the technicians measuring the systems found that their levels were off by a factor of 2.1 dB lower than the engineers had stated.

In the ensuing years, the use of isotropic radiators has migrated to the LMR and cellular industries, where the manufacturers will give their specified antenna gains in decibels over a dipole and decibels over an Isotropic point in space. The non-technical individuals such as purchasing agents will think that it is better to buy an 8.1 dBi antenna over a 6 dBd antenna, where they actually are the same antennas with the same amount of gain.

The radios in the link budgeting can be used as base stations, mobile stations, repeaters, control stations, and portable stations. There are myriad antennas available for each type of station, and these all must fit into the system design. In addition, just as the antennas must be a proper impedance match for the transmitters, they also must be a good match for the receiving channel. If your receiver channel is far removed in frequency from the transmitter channel frequency, you might have a problem with the antenna having a poor impedance match at one or both of the channels. In addition, the gain of the antenna might be seriously degraded or become a loss from the incorrect spacing at the different channel frequencies. A well-engineered system always will have these parameters in the proper ranges for the given system.

The receiver portion of the radio system, including the study of noise and interference, is an important part of the link budget, and will be examined — along with antenna systems, RF coverage tools and drive test methods — in the next installment of this series.

Common Frequency Bands

The common bands for LMR systems in the United States are:

  • High-frequency HF (3.0 MHz-30.0 MHz);
  • Low-band VHF (30 MHz-50 MHz);
  • Mid-band (72 MHz-76 MHz);
  • VHF high band (138 MHz-174 MHz);
  • 220 MHz;
  • UHF band (380 MHz-470 MHz);
  • UHF T-band (470 MHz-512 MHz);
  • 700 MHz band (narrowband and broadband);
  • 800 MHz;
  • 900 MHz band;
  • 2.4 GHz band;
  • 3.6 GHz;
  • 4.9 GHz band;
  • 5.2 GHz;
  • 5.8 GHz band.

Part 1: Class is in session: Basic LMR and FCC definitions
Part 2: Start at the beginning: Understanding LMR user needs
Part 3: The devil's in the details: Conducting a user-needs survey
Part 4: Decisions, decisions: Understanding the LRM procurement process
Part 6: The lynchpin: Receiver planning and installation
Part 7: Connecting the dots: How to connect LMR sites
Part 8: The next piece of the puzzle: Understanding dispatch communications
Part 9: Now the real work begins: How to select a suitable LMR site
Part 10: The bane of your existence: How to deal with RF interference
Part 11: Winning the battle: What causes radio frequency interference

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E., is a consulting engineer who has been involved in the radio communications business since 1966. He is a senior member of the IEEE and has been a licensed amateur radio operator since 1963. He can be reached at [email protected].

Robert C. Shapiro, P.E, is the senior manager-systems engineering for PlantCML. He serves on the TIA TR8 committee as the TSB-88.4-C task-group chair and is a senior member of the IEEE. He can be reached at [email protected].

Tags: Call Center/Command Wireless Networks

Most Recent


  • Let’s get started
    IWCE speakers debate state of public-safety interoperability
    LAS VEGAS—Achieving comprehensive interoperability for mission-critical communications used by U.S. public-safety agencies continues to be an elusive goal, according to speakers addressing the topic during a Monday session at the IWCE 2023 event in Las Vegas. Some view interoperability as the technical ability for one person to communicate with another, no matter what device or […]
  • UK competition watchdog delays Airwave-Motorola Solutions ruling until April
    The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) in the UK today announced that it plans to issue its final decision in April as part of an investigation of the Airwave TETRA network—a ruling that could investigation that could cost Motorola Solutions more than $1 billion in projected revenue during the next several years. CMA made the […]
  • AT&T claims LTE coverage edge, FirstNet build more than 99% done
    AT&T claims a 250,000-square-mile coverage advantage and that the planned five-year deployment of the FirstNet public-safety broadband network operating on the 700 MHz Band 14 spectrum licensed to the FirstNet Authority is more than 99% complete as a contractual deadline approaches this week. AT&T—the contractor responsible for building and maintaining the FirstNet public-safety broadband system—made […]
  • Verizon
    Verizon Frontline supports U.S. Forest Service efforts against wildfires
    Verizon Frontline increased its support of entities responding to wildland fires during 2022, particularly the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), which accounted for more than half of this activity by the carrier’s Crisis Response Team, according to the carrier. Cory Davis, Verizon’s assistant vice president for public safety, said that Verizon Frontline provided communications support to […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

To leave a comment login with your Urgent Comms account:

Log in with your Urgent Comms account

Or alternatively provide your name, email address below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Cars, Medicine, Electric Grids: Future hackers will hit much more than networks in an IT/OT integrated world
  • Securing an open-source OS for IoT
  • Let’s get started
    Newscan: Once, superpower summits were about nukes. Now, it’s cyberweapons.
  • Unfinished Business: Why NFPA and IBC fire codes need to kill the fire phone

Commentary


Updated: How ‘sidelink’ peer-to-peer communications can enhance public-safety operations

  • 1
27th February 2023

NG911 needed to secure our communities and nation

24th February 2023

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient

26th January 2023
view all

Events


UC Ezines


IWCE 2019 Wrap Up

13th May 2019
view all

Twitter


UrgentComm

The Future of Interoperability for Dispatch Console Solutions dlvr.it/Slcp33

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: A look in at the Panel Session of Interconnected Critical Networks - Voice, Video and Data Interoperability... #IWCE23 http…

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

RT @IWCEexpo: Wildfires are a growing concern, but technology can offer solutions. Fantastic panel moderated by @FirstNetGov this morning a…

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

IWCE speakers debate state of public-safety interoperability dlvr.it/SlcZ5L

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

UK competition watchdog delays Airwave-Motorola Solutions ruling until April dlvr.it/SlcNxN

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

Gallery: IWCE 2023 kicks off in Las Vegas dlvr.it/SlZlk4

28th March 2023
UrgentComm

AT&T claims LTE coverage edge, FirstNet build more than 99% done dlvr.it/SlXZfr

27th March 2023
UrgentComm

Verizon Frontline supports U.S. Forest Service efforts against wildfires dlvr.it/SlX1g3

27th March 2023

Newsletter

Sign up for UrgentComm’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about Communications and Technology.

Expert Commentary

Learn from experts about the latest technology in automation, machine-learning, big data and cybersecurity.

Business Media

Find the latest videos and media from the market leaders.

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital and print audiences? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • American City & County
  • IWCE
  • Light Reading
  • IOT World Today
  • Mission Critical Technologies
  • TU-Auto

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Careers

FOLLOW Urgent Comms ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.